Comments on: Tuning SQL Statement Execution in 10g, Part 1 http://www.ardentperf.com/2007/03/20/tuning-sql-statement-execution-in-10g-part-1/ Jeremy Schneider Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:15:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Tuning SQL Statement Execution in 10g, Part 2 : Ardent Performance Computing http://www.ardentperf.com/2007/03/20/tuning-sql-statement-execution-in-10g-part-1/#comment-39 Tuning SQL Statement Execution in 10g, Part 2 : Ardent Performance Computing Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:09:15 +0000 http://www.ardentperf.com/2007/03/20/tuning-sql-statement-execution-in-10g-part-1/#comment-39 [...] I wrote about a client in Houston and removing the RULE hint from queries as part of their 10g migration. This led into a discussion [...] [...] I wrote about a client in Houston and removing the RULE hint from queries as part of their 10g migration. This led into a discussion [...]

]]> By: Don Seiler http://www.ardentperf.com/2007/03/20/tuning-sql-statement-execution-in-10g-part-1/#comment-35 Don Seiler Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:38:52 +0000 http://www.ardentperf.com/2007/03/20/tuning-sql-statement-execution-in-10g-part-1/#comment-35 "Oracle 10g will not ignore the hint and your queries will work" One note (that I found out the hard way) is that the RULE hint cannot be used when dealing with partitioned tables. Love your blog! “Oracle 10g will not ignore the hint and your queries will work”

One note (that I found out the hard way) is that the RULE hint cannot be used when dealing with partitioned tables.

Love your blog!

]]>