Jun
1
Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson
Filed Under Non-Technical |
Interesting exchange between atheist Christopher Hitchens and Theologian Douglas Wilson, around the question “Is Christianity Good for the World”.
Got a little heated at times but I think there was some good content in there. Most of Wilson’s discussion revolved around the moral argument for God’s existence and I think he articulated it well. Interesting.
Wilson:
Actually, I believe I can present evidence for what I know. But evidence comes to us like food, and that is why we say grace over it. And we are supposed to eat it, not push it around on the plateāand if we don’t give thanks, it never tastes right. But here is some evidence for you, in no particular order. The engineering that went into ankles. The taste of beer. That Jesus rose from the dead on the third day, just like he said. A woman’s neck. Bees fooling around in the flower bed. The ability of acorns to manufacture enormous oaks out of stuff they find in the air and dirt. Forgiveness of sin. Storms out of the North, the kind with lightning. Joyous laughter (diaphragm spasms to the atheistic materialist). The ocean at night with a full moon. Delta blues. The peacock that lives in my yard. Sunrise, in color. Baptizing babies. The pleasure of sneezing. Eye contact. Having your feet removed from the miry clay, and established forever on the rock. You may say none of this tastes right to you. But suppose you were to bow your head and say grace over all of it. Try it that way.
Hitchens:
I like your joke about the reduction of mirth to a spasm (there was a solemn critic of P.G. Wodehouse who defined the smile in terms of “naso-labial” contractions), but I think you let yourself down a bit with your Hallmark conclusion. I dare say that I could add to the list of joys and even include one or two subjects which Christianity and other religions have made difficult to discuss in public. However, I shall select my own recent investigation of my DNA, which can now be sequenced and analyzed. I was perfectly happy with the “revelation” of my own kinship with other species and quite overwhelmed by the skill and precision of those who allowed me to do it. A lot of wit and beauty and intelligence had to go into the confirmation of my status as an evolved animal, just as a great deal of dullness and stupidity is required for the continuing denial of it.
Have to say that I’m more inclined to agree that there is such as thing as good and evil, right and wrong, the ordinary and the beautiful. Can’t see that just happening by accident.
Wilson: “The two fundamental tenets of true atheism. One: There is no God. Two: I hate Him.”
Although it does all make sense in the end, it’s not really about reason.